Chronicle editorial:
Parvati
Persaud-Edwards fired
|
Twenty-one
Policemen, a Prison Officer and now, a
soldier, have been murdered: many Policemen deliberately targeted
while unarmed and off-
duty, killed in cold blood.
An
ever-increasing number of innocent,
decent
people going about their everyday business have lost their
lives, innocent
victims of armed violence. None of us is secure from being
kidnapped. Many, in desperate fear of being killed
or kidnapped,
have shutdown their businesses, closed their homes and fled the country, their
life’s work destroyed, forced to begin again, aliens in a strange country,
often there illegally.
We now
live in a country overwhelmed, if not overtaken, by brutal, bestial, ruthless,
cold-blooded gangs of organised and sponsored killers. We have seemed helpless
to confront them, or is that now about to change?
These
are no ordinary criminals.
They are directed, financed and protected by identifiable and important
people in our society, masters of the illicit narcotics trade, visibly
rich without any apparent means at their disposal to make them so.
There
are others of these organised criminals who serve political masters dedicated
to destabilising the country and embarrassing the government, while, in fact,
they prey on the rich and poor alike and kill Guyanese
of every ethnic origin with equal ferocity.
Members
of the Police Force untrained, underpaid and ill-equipped have found
themselves the target of this onslaught against society and have too often
responded wrongly, but not surprisingly, by shooting first and asking
afterwards.
The
political opposition, not unhappy to see the Government in trouble, instead of
focusing their anger on the criminals, are all too quick to condemn the Police
and make excuses for the criminals.
Powerful
influential voices are raised against the police rather than the criminals in
the name of human rights and justice. Prominent among them, however, are
leading lawyers with questionable motives who make their fortunes defending
the few criminals whom the Police manage to put before the Courts.
All of
us, regardless of our politics or our ethnicity, are threatened. Yet, we seem
to have lost our sense of perspective, our sense of direction, even our sense
of preservation.
It is
the criminals and those who sponsor and offer them protection and who have
visited this madness on our nation, who should be the focus of our outrage?
The
buck, as the late American President Harry Truman once said, stops with the
President and who knows that better than the political opposition. The
President, however, is not all-powerful. He must depend on the Police and, if
and when necessary, the Defence Force, to do the job of cleaning out the
criminals and restoring law and order.
The President
had promised, and is giving, the Police and army the tools to do the job.
This, however, takes time. More important than the tools is the commitment,
attitude and professionalism of the Police and army in performing their duty.
The President, quite correctly, made it public that he was not satisfied with the performance of the security forces. He was specific. He has, he said, told them to “clean out the situation in Buxton”.
Two
'assholes' President
Jagdeo and Major General,
Michael Atherly
Chief-of-Staff
of the Defence Force, Brigadier General, Michael
Atherly, has, in my view, however indirectly, improperly responded
to the President. On May 12, addressing newly recruited Officer Cadets, the
Chief of Staff expressed his “serious concern” about what he described as
“the temptation of the Army to become too politicised an institution at the
centre of domestic strife”. He questioned “the notion of the GDF as the
guardian of internal order and social stability”.
But,
when the stability of a nation is threatened, whether the threat is internal
or external, that is precisely the task of the military when called upon by
the government.
The US
government, through its Ambassador, has declared “Guyanese authorities lack
the capability and resources to effectively deter or investigate these
crimes” and described Buxton “as a base for criminal activity”.
The PNC
have embraced Buxton as their own special village. On Nation Watch last week
Lance Carbury, with Hamley Case, Vincent Alexander, Clarissa Riehl and Charles
Corbin, in close support, declared Buxton to be “part of the country, part
of this society”. Yes, but when the Police and army carried out a search at
a chicken farm sponsored by the PNC,
they called it “deliberate mischief”. Buxton, according to the PNC, is off
limits to our security forces.
Buxton
is much more than a haven for organised crime; it is the centre and
headquarters of it. On any given day, gunmen with AK47s on public display
patrol the streets of central Buxton. Narcotics are sold and consumed openly
on the streets. The Police and army, unless in significant numbers and
displaying maximum force capability, cannot enter Buxton and when they do they
come under criticism from the PNC Executives. The events of the past few days
triggered by the kidnapping of Mr.
Viticharan Singh, may have changed their minds.
Has it
occurred to the PNC that the public ambivalence they displayed towards dealing
with the criminals who are in command in Buxton, makes their condemnation of
the criminal assault on our country less than believable?
Welcome
though it is, one determined, successful joint operation of the security
forces against the bandits embedded in Buxton will not, of course, cure the
problem.
The
attack on the country by organised crime is a national problem. It transcends
partisan politics. While it is the government’s first responsibility to
protect the security of the State and maintain law and order and to use all
the forces at its disposal to do so, every law-abiding citizen is the target
and the potential victim of the criminals. The war on crime demands a
collective political response.
We are
now on official public international notice that Guyana is not a safe place to
be in, not a safe place to invest in, to do business in or to live in, the
consequence of which we hardly need spell out.
I would
like to see our President and Robert Corbin joined by every other
parliamentary leader together on television declaring a “war on organised
crime”.
I would like to see a “Bipartisan Council on Crime” chaired by the President and with every parliamentary leader a member and, including the Social Partners, meeting regularly with a full and unqualified mandate of the Cabinet to direct the war on crime.